Is Astrology a True Science?

Astrology has long been considered a pseudoscience by many experts in the field of science. Despite this, there are still many people who attempt to provide rational defenses for its validity. One such argument posits that the brightness of a planet is diminished when it is close to the Sun, citing empirical evidence to support this claim. However, upon closer examination, this explanation falls apart.

For instance, no planet has its own light; instead, it reflects the light of other celestial bodies. This means that any perceived changes in a planet's brightness are likely due to external factors rather than an inherent property of the planet itself. Furthermore, the concept of a planet 'losing its strength' or 'combustion' is symbolic and lacks empirical evidence.

Another issue with astrology is the lack of clear definitions regarding what constitutes 'strength' or 'brightness' in terms of human impact. If astrology is meant to be a science that predicts human behavior based on planetary positions, then it is crucial to understand exactly how these positions affect us. Unfortunately, this understanding is absent from astrological texts.

The reliance on superstition and fear can also contribute to the persistence of astrology. People may turn to astrology as a means of coping with uncertainty and insecurity about the future. This vulnerability can be exploited by individuals who claim to have expertise in the field, leading people to forsake evidence-based thinking for pseudoscientific beliefs.

Ultimately, it is essential to critically examine the claims made by astrologers and to seek out credible sources of information. By doing so, we can eliminate our vulnerability to superstition and promote a more rational understanding of the world around us.

Is astrology a true science